Overtime Law Blog

Home » Attorney's Fees » E.D.N.Y.: Plaintiff’s Prevailing Fees Not Subject to Reduction Because of Low Opt-in Rate

E.D.N.Y.: Plaintiff’s Prevailing Fees Not Subject to Reduction Because of Low Opt-in Rate

Submit Your Case - Copy (2)

TwitterGoogle+LinkedInRSSJustia

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 295 other subscribers

RSS DOL News

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

Andrew Frisch

Estrella v. P.R. Painting Corp.

The E.D.N.Y. joined Courts from around the Country, (see, e.g. Prater v. Commerce Equities Management Co., Inc., 2008 WL 5140045 (S.D.Tex. 2008)), and found that where, as here, the Plaintiffs recovered their full unpaid overtime compensation, the prevailing Plaintiff’s attorney’s fees were not subject to reduction, based on a low opt-in rate to Plaintiff’s Court-approved Notice.  Additionally, the Court reiterated that an attorney’s travel time is compensible at 50% their normal rate.


%d bloggers like this: